WikiGalaxy

Personalize

Deadlock Prevention in Operating Systems

Understanding Deadlock Prevention:

Deadlock prevention is a set of methods used to ensure that the system will never enter a deadlock state. It involves designing a system in such a way that the possibility of deadlock is excluded.

Deadlock can occur when multiple processes are waiting for resources held by each other.
The primary goal is to ensure that at least one of the necessary conditions for deadlock cannot hold.

Mutual Exclusion

Concept of Mutual Exclusion:

Mutual exclusion ensures that only one process can access a critical section or resource at a time. This is essential for preventing race conditions but can lead to deadlocks if not managed properly.

Critical resources, such as printers or files, must be accessed exclusively.
Implementing mutual exclusion can be done using locks or semaphores.


      synchronized (resource) {
        // Critical section code
      }

Why Mutual Exclusion Matters:

Ensuring mutual exclusion helps avoid race conditions but requires careful design to prevent deadlocks.

Hold and Wait

Concept of Hold and Wait:

Hold and wait condition occurs when a process is holding at least one resource and is waiting to acquire additional resources that are currently being held by other processes.

Processes must request all resources they need before execution.
Alternatively, processes must release their held resources before requesting new ones.


      if (!resourcesAvailable()) {
        releaseResources();
        requestResources();
      }

Preventing Hold and Wait:

By ensuring that processes do not hold resources while waiting for others, deadlock can be prevented.

No Preemption

Understanding No Preemption:

No preemption condition arises when resources cannot be forcibly taken away from a process holding them. This can lead to deadlocks as processes wait indefinitely for resources.

Resources should be preemptible, meaning they can be taken away and reassigned.
This can be achieved by suspending processes and reallocating resources.


      if (canPreempt(resource)) {
        preempt(resource);
      }

Implementing Preemption:

Allowing preemption of resources can help in preventing deadlocks by ensuring resources are not indefinitely held.

Circular Wait

Explaining Circular Wait:

Circular wait condition occurs when a closed chain of processes exists, where each process holds at least one resource needed by the next process in the chain.

Impose a total ordering of all resource types.
Ensure that each process requests resources in an increasing order of enumeration.


      if (requestedResource > currentResource) {
        allocateResource();
      }

Avoiding Circular Wait:

By ordering resource requests, the circular wait condition can be avoided, thus preventing deadlocks.

Banker's Algorithm

Introduction to Banker's Algorithm:

The Banker's Algorithm is a deadlock avoidance algorithm that tests for safety by simulating the allocation of predetermined maximum possible amounts of all resources, and then makes an "s-state" check to test for possible activities before deciding whether allocation should be allowed to continue.

It is named so because it can be compared to a banker's decision in allocating cash to customers.
It helps in avoiding deadlocks by ensuring that the system remains in a safe state.


      boolean isSafeState() {
        // Logic to check if the state is safe
      }

Utilizing Banker's Algorithm:

By simulating resource allocation and checking for safe states, Banker's Algorithm helps in avoiding deadlocks.

Resource Allocation Graph

Understanding Resource Allocation Graph:

A resource allocation graph is a directed graph that represents the state of the system in terms of resources allocated to processes and resources requested by processes.

Nodes represent processes and resources.
Edges represent the allocation and request of resources.


      // Pseudo-code to represent Resource Allocation Graph
      addEdge(process, resource);

Analyzing Resource Allocation Graph:

By examining the graph, one can detect cycles which indicate potential deadlocks.

Wait-Die and Wound-Wait Schemes

Exploring Wait-Die and Wound-Wait Schemes:

These are deadlock prevention schemes based on timestamps to resolve conflicts between transactions in a database system.

In Wait-Die, older transactions wait for younger ones, while younger transactions are aborted.
In Wound-Wait, younger transactions wait for older ones, while older transactions abort younger ones.


      if (olderTransaction) {
        wait();
      } else {
        abort();
      }

Implementing Wait-Die and Wound-Wait:

These schemes help in preventing deadlocks by using timestamps to decide the fate of transactions.